So the big "gotcha" question for Bachmann.... for the left, it seems, is what does her marriage vow to love, honor, and obey obey her husband mean?
Got one question for ya, o Progressive Left.... Would you vote for a devout Muslim woman for president?
Well, wouldja? Yes or no?
What's the matter? Cat got your tongue?
It seems to me that according the progressive left, at least, Christians need not apply. Unless it's a vague, toothless, a la carte "spiritual" Christianity.
It's also lauded by the left when strong First Ladies influenced their husbands decisions. Why would we expect it to be any different with a First Dude?
A couple is a package deal, and if it's a good couple, that is far from a bad thing. It is a great thing.
2 comments:
Honestly, I think it's any religion need not apply for the left.
Yeah, they hate Christianity more than other religions (they've got it confused with their daddies), but since leftism is already a religion, belief in an actual deity feels like bigmay to them.
I did't watch the debate. The primaries are like the baseball season to me. I only watch the highlights on the news until the playoffs.
"So the big "gotcha" question for Bachmann.... for the left, it seems, is what does her marriage vow to love, honor, and obey obey her husband mean?"
As far as I am concerned the right response to this question is "Why didn't you ask Bill Clinton what his marriage vows to 'love, honor and cherish his wife' meant to him. As for me and my husband that's between us."
Next question.
Post a Comment